Stupid Lawsuits
I kinda enjoy reading class action lawsuits, and I often make a claim when I’m a part of a class.
Sometimes one crosses my email box that is just, well a waste of bits. Like this one:
The lawsuit claims that Wal-Mart and Netflix reached an unlawful agreement under which Wal-Mart would withdraw from the online DVD rental market and Netflix would not sell new DVDs. The lawsuit claims that this agreement caused Netflix subscribers to pay higher prices for online DVD rentals. Wal-Mart and Netflix deny: (1) that they entered into such an agreement, (2) that they have done anything wrong, (3) that the Plaintiffs have been harmed in any way, or (4) that the price of online DVD rentals was raised or inflated by any agreement between Wal-Mart and Netflix.- In re: Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation
This completely annoyed me, to the point that I wanted nothing to do with it, so I filled instructions and excluded myself with this snappy little missive:
November 16, 2011
In re: Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2029
To Whom It May Concern:
Please exclude me from the Netflix Litigation Class. I have no desire to support meritless lawsuit such as this one. WalMart’s DVD service never took off, it was their business failing that was the cause of this. The Class Representatives and the Class Council should be ashamed of themselves for wasting resources and time when they could be doing something that creates actual value in the world.Regards,
Nicholas Barnard
The relevancy of posting this here will become clear within a week.
I was going through my Facebook feed several days ago and I came across this shocking juxtaposition of stories on two separate robberies.
On the face it seems really plain and simple doesn’t it?
I was doubtful, so I went googling around to find out more. Snopes says its true. There is a good article on About.com about it, but the comment thread really raises doubts on the simplicity presented in the picture above.
Let us address the Mortgage CEO first. Some key text in the AP article is “for his role in a $3 billion scheme”. I don’t know exactly what happened, but the argument was made that Paul R. Allen was a CEO in name only. Apparently he worked from home and the Chairman actually orchestrated much of the fraud. Did Allen know about the fraud? Yes. Should he have caught this and stopped it? Yes. The judge in his case says he was made aware of problems, but did nothing. Allen for his part acknowledged his errors, admitted that “I messed up. I messed up big“, and he was generally remorseful.
Let us address the homeless bank robber. On its face, Roy Brown should be sentenced to community service, thanked for his honesty, and released. However, the article states that he had “one of his hands under his jacket.” That is shitty reporting. Its a euphemism for saying that his hand was under his jacket mimicking a gun. That makes the robbery technically armed. Doing that is like making a terrorist joke at the airport or threatening the President: there is an automatic assumption that you’re not joking, and its taken seriously.
There also is the question of Brown’s criminal history. I’ve not been able to get a news source on this, the About.com article comments, as well as another discussion site both mention he has eight prior convictions. What for? I don’t know. It also looks like Brown’s fake weapon triggered Louisiana’s three strike law, which increased his sentence.
However, the deeper question raised by the article is the criminalization of drug use. Brown stole the money “to stay at the detox center”. I know that the government doesn’t have unlimited funds, but I’m sure that its cheaper to spend the money on getting someone through detox than to put them in prison for 15 years.
Brown ran afoul of the law while playing the shitty hand that was likely half dealt to him and half picked up by him. In an ideal world, he shouldn’t have even needed the money that he stole from the bank. To really fix the root cause of the problem you’ve gotta dig deeper than just these two articles and sentencing laws.
Finally, Lee Farkas, the Chairman whom committed the mortgage fraud? He got 30 years in prison. He’s the only criminal in this blog entry who didn’t show any remorse. Asshole.
I live in downtown Seattle, I spend many of my days either there or in Seattle’s Capital Hill neighborhood. Seattle’s inner neighborhoods are part of my daily existence.
I know where many of the homeless shelters, feeding programs, and other support that we Seattlites provide for homeless people are: They’re all within a few blocks of my home. Seeing homeless people is part of my daily existence.
I’ll admit that I’m a bit desensitized to seeing homeless people as I come and go, but I also refuse to treat homeless people as if they don’t exist, if they ask me something I do my best to respond, even if I usually have to say no. Brief conversations with homeless people is part of my daily existence.
I see homeless people with their standard issue blankets around Seattle. I wonder where the blankets come from, as they don’t look really comfortable, but I surmise they’ve been chosen based on their ability to retain heat while resisting water and being cheap to procure, so that our social service organizations can make their budgets go that much further. Seeing those blankets is part of my daily existence.
I see the homeless people with their signs written on cardboard. Most of the time I glance at them. The signs run together in my head more than I’d like to admit. There must be an example sign that homeless people receive which guides them on how to put together their signs. Occasionally the signs are funny, sometimes they’re moving, frequently they’ll sometimes mention how someone has served their country usually in the military in general, or the sign will refer to a specific war. Sometimes people will mention their ailments, such as cancer, mental illnesses, or another affliction. There are also creative geniuses amongst homeless people, with some people choosing to play on humor to solicit donations. Often times this involves referencing beer or weed. Reading the signs that homeless people write and hold is part of my daily existence.
There is only so much I can do to ameliorate the suffering of homeless people. I myself am not rich. I live comfortably through managing a reasonable amount of debt prudently. However, I also recognize that I too should help out in mitigating the social inequities that are part of our country’s existence. I pay my taxes, which in Seattle is mostly sales and property taxes. I’ll admit to purchasing items from out of state merchants to bypass the sales tax, but that is our current national past time. I donate more than is comfortable to my church, understanding that a reasonable amount, but not enough goes toward social justice issues. Doing what little I can to relieve suffering is part of my daily existence.
I was walking out of the drugstore next to my gym earlier today, and there was a gentleman probably in his mid-50s, with a muddled sign that read said “Homeless” and “Mentally Ill”. His face was crystal clear in communicating, the pain, anguish, embarrassment, and frustration within his soul. I didn’t gaze for long, I simply could not stand the compressed emotional intimacy in fleeting blunt gaze that we shared. I crossed the street to my destination as quickly as possible. Running away from a stranger because I couldn’t stand being in the mist of their pain and suffering is not part of my daily existence.
I had just read earlier today about Representative John Fleming who stated that he’s spending $200,000 just to “feed my family” and then he complained about the $400,000 in take home pay that he is left with. The cognitive dissonance of the vulnerable in our society just trying to get by and the well in our society thinking they’re just barely getting by fills me with disgust and anger.
I challenge anyone to look into a the eyes of a homeless person as I did today, then in the same moment say that we should cut funding for the social safety net that attempts to provide some modicum of decency and humanity to that person. I doubt that you can. However, if you can I’ll still respect your inherent humanity, even if I don’t respect you.
There are days I’m ashamed to be an American. Today is one of them.
However, I know America is and can be greater than this. I will do my part to manifest this vision to bring us to greatness. I owe myself and my fellow countrymen and countrywomen nothing less.
So Netflix announced yesterday that they were splitting their DVD business off into Qwikster.
The internets have been up in arms about the split of the DVD business, and in particular about though about the websites being completely separate. Many people have made a huge deal about this comment:
Is Netflix making this transition in a perfect way? Nope. But I’d argue there is no perfect way to make this transition. As they say in their blog entry, they’d rather make the change earlier rather than later. I’d wouldn’t be surprised if Netflix offers an option on Netflix where they’d link to the video if it is available on Qwikster if it isn’t on Netflix, and vice versa.
But where is this a winner? Branding. Instead of trying to sell Netflix as both streaming and DVDs in the US. Netflix is now only streaming. Qwikster is only discs by mail. The Netflix folks want the Netflix name associated with streaming, not discs by mail. Instead of waiting until its too late to separate the brands, they’re doing it now. The strong example they use for this is AOL. People associate AOL with dialup internet, not with the content provider that they are now. (This is why AOL’s content sites aren’t branded with AOL.)
Netflix splitting DVD rental off into its own site as taking care of what is likely one of the biggest disconnects that they have on their service, which is what videos are available in what format.
I ran into this myself back on June 25th. I had recently gone to streaming only after having been a DVD or DVD and streaming customer for somewhere around ten years. I ran across The Adjustment Bureau and I wanted to add it to my Netflix queue. I found the movie on Netflix and I couldn’t add it to my queue because it was only available on DVD. I was furious, I thought to myself, “WHY THE HELL CAN’T I ADD THIS TO MY DVD QUEUE??” As all irate customers are supposed to do, I picked up the phone and vented to a poor customer service representative. She managed to bring me around to being understanding while enlightening me about the background for the changes. I learned that:
- My DVD queue still existed, I just couldn’t access or add anything new to it, since they wouldn’t be sending me any DVDs. She explained that this was because they didn’t want to set an expectation for customers who had streaming only plans that Netflix would be able to stream this movie to them. She stated that they’d had this problem before with other customers.
- I inquired why I couldn’t add it to my instant queue. She said that you could add a movie to the instant queue if it was available for streaming or if they knew it was going to be available for streaming. In this case they did not have an agreement to stream it with Universal Pictures. Again, this is a matter of properly setting expectations with customers. There is no point to be able to allow folks to add a movie to their instant queue if they’re not going to be able to stream it in the foreseeable future.
- They had removed the ability to manage the DVD queue from other devices such as the iOS app, PlayStation, XBox for the same reason, that it set poor expectations for their customers that they could stream the movie on to the device.
At this point the technology and media aware crowd is of course is saying:
“Really? People were getting confused over this?”
Yup. They were, and Netflix wants to have a good customer experience, the most important part of which is being able to set and meet your customer’s expectations.
Netflix is willing to make a radical change that doesn’t seem to make sense from the outside. For instance, they stopped offering email support back in 2007. When Netflix did this, Michael Osier, Netflix’s vice president for information technology operations and customer service at the time said to the New York Times,
My assessment was that a world-class e-mail program was still going to be consistently lower in quality and effectiveness than a phone program.
As someone who has been on the receiving side of customers’ emails I understand that providing quality customer service via email is difficult. Sure it is fine if you’ve got a knowledgable IT professional asking you to do something fairly transactional such as adding reverse-DNS. However, when you get a average customer opening a ticket because their internet connection is down, we just went to the point of “please call us” because we couldn’t troubleshoot via email, because internet connectivity troubleshooting requires too much coordination between both sides. Most customers don’t know how to use email appropriately, asking them to call in when they’ve indicated that they’d like to complete a request via email is a way to completely miss an expectation.
Instead Netflix allows most routine requests to be entered in a structured manner, so customers know exactly what they’re requesting, and Netflix doesn’t have to have someone handle an email.
One other reason I see them doing this is to be able to minimize comments such as these from Dexter:
- Please put dexter season 3 and 4 on the instant queue me and my friend fell in love with the first two seasons and we really want to continue watching dexter.thank you
- Please put Dexter Season Three on Instant. You guys are already losing business because of the hike in prices. Do us a favor please!
- Dexter seasons 3 and 4 need to be available on streaming internet!!!! please make this happen!!! i love this site but the options of things to watch are getting slim.
- Why did they take away dexter season 1 and 2 off of streaming?! UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Dexter isn’t available on a streaming only Netflix there won’t be a page for people to comment on. Also, since Qwikster won’t offer streaming customers there have no expectation that the’ll be getting streaming video.
Netflix is managing their customer’s expectations, which is one of the most important parts of any business. I learned back in the days I managed fast food, it didn’t matter if you were great or if you sucked, people just wanted to know what they were going to get.
Managing and meeting expectations is key to keeping customers happy.
I’m on my way home from a quick trip to Portland, so its time to talk about the transportation.
First lets talk about how I got to Portland. I chose to take the train. If you’re just comparing block times it makes taking the train look like it takes an eternity over flying, and its even longer than the three hour or so drive. Alaska Airlines runs a flight between the two that blocks at just about 50 minutes. But comparing a 50 minute to plane ride to a 50 minute train ride is a grossly inaccurate comparison.
I arrived to both train stations 15 minutes before departure time. Thats not arriving at the gate, thats walking in the front door of the station. For the plane, Alaska suggests that you arrive 90 minutes in advance, if you don’t have bags or two hours if you do. These are aggressively padded times, so lets figure half of that is really what you need. I’ve found that works just fine. So you’ve gotta arrive 45 minutes in advance. So we’re upto an hour and a half for the plane, and the train? Its 3 hours and 45 minutes.
But if I’m flying out of Seattle I need to actually get to the airport, so thats another 45 minutes by light rail, 20 minutes if I’m taking a car, and 10 more minutes if I’m needing to park at the airport. The walk for me to the light rail station is virtually the same as it is to the Amtrak station, so I’m counting it as taking no time. The scorecard? Plane: 2 hours 15 minutes Train: 3 hours 45 minutes.
Then when I get there I’ve gotta leave the vicinity of the airport. In Portland getting to my first destination would take another 24 minutes driving or an hour on public transit. On the train? Walking its 15 minutes and public transit is about the same. Score: Plane: 2 hours 45 minutes Train: 4 hours.
So the train takes an hour and 15 minutes more. However, taking the train means you don’t have to deal with the TSA, nor do you have any times where you’re restricted from doing things. I’ve had my tray table down on the train since I sat down before leaving either eating or using the laptop. Plus you can make phone calls just about the whole way on Amtrak, thats not quite the case flying.
Finally, price comes in. I paid $55.80 for the train trip with only a single discount, a similar plane ticket two months out would be $161.40, so that hour and 15 minutes longer on the train? It saves just over $40 per hour. That is without even attempting to calculate the productivity increase while traveling.
So to go to Portland the train wins hands down as far as I’m concerned with the exception of frequency. Alaska runs a shit ton of flights between Portland and Seattle; Amtrak runs five trains each way.
Oh, there is one other thing about Portland. I’ve heard people crow and extoll virtues of Portland’s Streetcar. Yes, its good, but as far as I’m concerned it isn’t reasonable to compare Portland’s Streetcar to Seattle’s bus system.
Geographically they’re hugely different places. Portland has a large street gridded area completely unimpeded by natural barriers. Seattle on the other hand built its downtown on a fucking hill. Not one of those pansy gently rolling hills. In downtown there is a change of 190 feet over half a mile or a 7.2% grade; if it were an interstate it’d get one of those signs telling truckers to stay in a lower gear.
Yes, Seattle needs more trains and streetcars, but comparing getting around in Seattle and Portland isn’t really fair.
The trip? It was great!
I hesitate at holding one school class or activity up over another, as I see all of the classes I took in school as important to a holistic understanding of the world and for developing skills for life. (Yes, that includes those English classes in Upper School where my grades (in order) were C+, C+, U, C, D, C-, C, D+, C, U, U, D+. (Wow, I just realized I never got above a C+ in English, this shouldn’t surprise me, however it mildly does.))
So, what did I learn in Art and Music? Yes, I learned those “hard” things such as music notation, color theory, vocal techniques, how to “throw” a pot on wheel, and how to understand complex rhythms. I even learned some of those “softer” things, such a teamwork and performance etiquette. But, thats not what this blog entry is about.
Music and art classes most importantly taught me how to implement a vision. In music class, and really more specifically in the performing groups I was a part of, I participated in implementing a vision. At least twice a year, Mrs. Butke would present us with several new pieces of music, and we’d begin working on them to turn them into gems. Mrs. Butke had developed the ability to look at the dots, lines, and text we call music, and envision them in her mind’s ear, and guide us students toward meeting that end goal.
In art classes, we were encouraged to figure out our own ideas and vision for our art pieces, and bring them into a physical reality. Yes, sometimes we’d be given a general medium to work in or a general form to work toward. But, if an art teacher says “make a pot”, the art student is left with many different ways to achieve this, stacking little coils of clay around and around to create a pot, flattening out pieces of clay and building up walls of the pot, or taking a ball clay, putting it on a spinning disc, and guiding it into a pot. But in all of those cases, you have to have some idea of what it should look like when you’re finished, it may not end up looking anything like that initial vision, but you must have a vision to get started.
I’ve enjoyed reading Jason W. Krug’s blog The Creative. I’ve found his writing inspirational and enlightening, especially as I careen down the gauntlet of staring a company. The blog has its own guidance, but it also connects me to those lessons I learned back in school.
So, a few of you are probably wondering what exactly all this talk about creativity has to do with starting a company. You’re thinking starting a business is well, business class stuff and music and art are about creating music and art.
Jason put this in clarity in his recent entry, In Praise of Hard Work:
The funny thing about composing, though — the income I get this year is a direct result of my hard work from the past 12-36 months or so. I could start today and work my tail off for a solid month, and I wouldn’t see the fruits of that labor for probably at least a year and a quarter, possibly longer. Such is the nature of the beast.
Starting a business from scratch fits right into the first paragraph. Writing a business plan doesn’t pay. Its much like composing. You’ve gotta pretty much write the whole thing, then go shopping it around to investors, who might provide you with funding. Its the same process of writing music and sending it out to see if you can get a publisher to pick it up.
So why did I never get above a C+ in English class? First, I went to a tough college preparatory school. (Also, those last two U’s and D+ were given to me by a teacher who takes a huge amount of pride in being as difficult a grader as he can be.) Second, for many reasons I struggled with going from “write a 2-3 page paper on this book” to having the 2-3 page paper written.
Those Cs in English were happening at the same time I was getting As (and the occasional B) in Art and Music classes. At the time I saw English classes not a a joy within themselves, but as a means to an end. A way to get into college, to get a job, to live life. That end desire was eight to twelve years in front of me in upper school, which is an eternity for a teenager. Music and art were their own joy right now, perhaps not immediately, but in a couple of months.
Starting this business is one of those things were success is at best twelve months in the future. (If the company was fully funded at this moment, it’d take twelve months at a normal pace to deliver the product.) But, more realistically its somewhere in the 16-24 month range. Which brings me to the second quote:
I think of two of the most successful composers I know … don’t work hard because of their success; they have their success because they work hard.
I’ve learned many times that hard work creates success, but I still need the reminders, especially when it comes to implementing my own vision. The vision my company’s product first entered my heading the hallway between the art room and the music room.
If like Zeus, I could’ve created in whole from my head, I would have. But, I am neither Zeus, nor is my vision Athena.
Its gonna take some hard work, and music and art classes gave me the fortitude to do this, not some business class, not math class, not english class, music and art taught me how to bring my visions into the world.
Fixing Safari and Spaces
For those of you who are used to my usual musings on society, politics, and just general stuff, you’ll can safely skip this entry. This is a completely geeky blog entry, that applies pretty specifically to OS X Lion.
So I don’t talk about programming/scripting much, since well I don’t do much of it, and what I do is usually so specific to my needs, it doesn’t make sense to share it with the world. In this instance however, I think this’ll have a fairly common application.
I’ve actually started using spaces, or as they call it now Mission Control in OS X. I’ve previously fiddled with it, but I’ve never really put it into standard use in my daily work. However, with Lion and its iOS like gestures, I have finally started using it. What I’ve done is put each of my basic organizational tools in its own space, so its easy to four finger swipe to it. My standard setup has five spaces:
- Dashboard — Which I like in its own space after initially being really annoyed with that setup.
- My main workspace — I do most of my web browsing, email, chatting, etc from this space
- Safari, opened to Toodledo — I organize all my tasks and a bunch of other things in this great web application.
- iCal — I really like this calendaring application. It works quite well for my needs, and Apple hasn’t screwed it up in Lion.
- Safari, opened to Mobile Me‘s Contacts Page — If I need to find someone’s address or phone number this is where I do it, since Apple completely screwed up the address book in Lion.
So this serves me pretty well, except when:
- I’m interacting with another application in my main workspace.
- I open a link from that application.
- And, I don’t have a non-minimized window of Safari open in my main space.
What I’d like to have happen would be for Safari to open a new window in my main workspace. However, Safari has different ideas, and opens a tab in one of my other spaces with Safari in it, and switches to it. (usually the Toodledo one, although I’m not quite sure how it makes its choice.) Usually, I try not to write any code/scripts, I start with Googling around and see if I can find something that fits my needs.
So, as per my SOP, I went Googling and found a good script by jaysoffian over at MacWorld. Its from the Snow Leopard days, and actually using it has a few quirks that may be Lion specific. It does a great job if there are no instances of Safari in the main workspace, but if there is a minimized window, it believes this is sufficient to open the page in the current space, however Safari opens a tab in one of the other Spaces with Safari in it. So, more Googling for me! I found a script by relishgargler over at MacScripter which determines if a minimized window of the application exists. Since, I only have one space where Safari could be minimized, this works for me.
The final quirk that I came upon was an edge case, that probably qualifies as a bug. If your last interaction with Safari was while it was full screen, it opens the link in a window, but the title and close, minimize, resize, and full size buttons are obscured below the menu bar. I did some fiddling that’ll fix that, however, I wasn’t able to find a way to see if this condition existed, so I just put the fix in for it every time that it could occur, which means that the window will do a little dance frequently. It isn’t ideal, but it works.
So I’ve put the script below as its source. Simply copy and paste, save as an application with the Stay Open option chosen. For those of you who don’t want to muck with AppleScript editor, you can get SafariURLHelper3 from, uh that link. Simply unzip it and drop it somewhere nice on your Mac, I suggest putting it in the utilities folder.
Finally, to make it actually work, go to Safari->Preferences->General, choose select, then find SafariURLHelper3 on your system. And you’re done.
-- SafariURLHelper3, heavily modified from http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20091013114424722 on open location theURL --- Figures out what application is currently in front, given one method of opening a window needs to make Safari Frontmost. set CurFront to GetFrontmostApp() --Identifies if there are any windows of safari in this space, if not it creates a new window tell application "System Events" if (count of windows of process "Safari") = 0 then tell application "Safari" to make new document my FixPositioning(CurFront) tell application "Safari" to open location theURL return end if end tell -- Identifies if there are any minimized windows of Safari. Might not work properly if you have it minimized in other spaces. YMMV. set MinCheck to 0 tell application "Safari" repeat with i in every window tell i if miniaturized is true then set MinCheck to 1 exit repeat end if end tell end repeat end tell if MinCheck is not equal to 0 then tell application "Safari" to make new document my FixPositioning(CurFront) tell application "Safari" to open location theURL return end if -- If we've not opened the URL above, just hand it off to Safari to open it. tell application "Safari" to open location theURL end open location -- From http://hintsforums.macworld.com/archive/index.php/t-22098.html on GetFrontmostApp() repeat tell application "System Events" try set apName to name of first process whose frontmost is true on error --because Finder 7.5.1 doesn't list itself... if frontmost then set apName to "Finder" else --just to be on the safe side! set apName to "" end if end try if apName ≠ "" then exit repeat end tell end repeat return apName end GetFrontmostApp on FixPositioning(CurFront) -- Ensures an edge case doesn't cause issues. If you've interacted with Safari full screen in a space it mispositions the window cutting off the title, and Close/Minimize/Resize buttons tell application "System Events" tell process "Safari" to set frontmost to true tell process "Safari" to click menu item "Zoom" of menu "Window" of menu bar 1 tell application "Safari" to set the bounds of the first window to {140, 0, 1160, 775} tell process CurFront to set frontmost to true end tell return end FixPositioning
Cats Provide the Best Entertainment
So, I was grabbing my bedtime snack, extra large curd cottage cheese (Don’t judge, its good shit), when I got buzzed by a moth. George immediately picked up on this, and went meowing after it and attempting to catch it.
Now the moth, being a moth, was attracted to the brightest light in the apartment, which was hanging from the ceiling, completely out of the reach of George. Now, I being a good cat servant, went about turning off all the lights, except one which I put near a chair, so that the moth would become accessible.
I’m not quite sure what happened, but somehow George got the idea that the moth had hid under the mat upon which his food bowl sits. Not one to be deterred by a simple mat, he took to exploring under the mat. I by this time had gotten my extra large curd cottage cheese, and instead of staring at the computer screen, decided to watch the cat, for a good five minutes as he went spelunking under the mat for the moth.
While George was doing this, George’s brother, Shaun, awoke from whatever uninterruptible slumber he was in, and walked up to his brother and decided that George was not clean enough, and he needed a bath behind the ear. (How Shaun decided this at that very moment I don’t know, as I generally tend to think George is not clean enough; He’s the only cat whose ass I’ve needed to wipe.)
Through all this hubbub I managed to lose the location of the moth, so I don’t know where it is…
Lucky Guy
I’m sitting at the waterfront looking out over Elliot Bay, the sun shimmering across the water, and I’m feeling I’m the luckiest guy in the world.
But really, luck had nothing to do with this. Issac Wilkins calls for a focused used of aggression. I’d perhaps compare my move to Seattle as an aggressive move, but it was too unfocused, too unplanned.
I’ve gotten where I’m at through a unique blend of blind drive, stupidity, and a great support system of friends, family, and my church community.
I’ve had the blind drive to get where I’ve wanted to go, but it is community that has really pushed me higher toward achieving the dreams behind that blind ambition.
A Real American Dream
I’ve been discussing homeownership off the blog with my friend Cindy, in an extension of our discussion from my thoughts on the Irrational Attraction to Homeownership.
I wrote her an email today explaining why I think the desire for homeownership, and especially “The American Dream of Home Ownership” is as manufactured as the idea of a diamond engagement ring as a symbol of love.
I think its interesting and instructive to compare what Jonathan Larsen thought of the American reality of the early 1990s and to compare that to John F. Kennedy’s vision of an American Dream. So, if you would please indulge me with a few quotes:
Don’t breathe too deep / Don’t think all day / Dive into work / Drive the other way / That drip of hurt / That pint of shame / Goes away / Just play the game / You’re living in America / At the end of the millennium / You’re living in America / Leave your conscience at the tone / And when you’re living in America / At the end of the millennium / You’re what you own
…
Just tighten those shoulders / Just clench your jaw til you frown / Just don’t let go / Or you may drown / You’re living in America / At the end of the millennium / You’re what you own
…
Alexi – Mark / Call me a hypocrite / I need to finish my own film / I quit!Dying in America / A the end of the millennium / We’re dying in America / To come into our own / And when you’re dying in America / At the end of the millennium / You’re not alone / I’m not alone / I’m not alone
&emdash; Jonathan Larsen through his characters Mark and Roger in “What you Own” from Rent (c. 1994)
Contrast this with John F. Kennedy’s description of the American Dream from the early 1960s.
But why, some say, the moon? Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.
&emdash; John F Kennedy, Rice Stadium on Sept 12 1962
When did we move from the American Dream being pursuing your wildest visions and hopes, to measuring ourselves by what we own?
I’m where Mark and Roger are when they’re singing What You Own. I cannot and will not play the corporate consumerist American game. I agree with George Carlin’s statement from his CD Explicit Lyrics: “Pointless careerism? Pointless careerism? … To take a job in a criminal corporation that’s poisoning the environment and robbing customers out of their money? This is the worthiest thing they can think of? Isn’t there something nobler they can do to be helping this planet heal?” This isn’t to say that corporations in and of themselves are by definition immoral, but the demands placed on the managers of those corporations drive them to decisions that are less and less moral.
When I kick around what I’d like to be doing with my life, the real bottom line is simple: I want to create something. It is even better if it changes our world.
There have been so many ways this has manifested itself in my life. I love theatre because you’re part of making something, even if you’re only watching. But the process of collaboration and creation is simply one of the most joyful things I have experienced in my life. Handbells have been a huge part of this past year for me, and the joy of creating music with a group is wonderful.
So, now its time to create the hardest thing I’ve ever aimed to do: start a company and change an industry. Its one of the scariest things I’ve ever done, fraught with an huge amount of personal risk, but also a huge potential for joy and a space in which I believe I can engage my signature strengths.
This my friends is An American Dream. A real one, not one handed down from Madison Avenue or Washington DC. This is why people sailed across the oceans, to pursue their dreams fully and head on.
The American Dream is not a house, or what you own. The American Dream is one made of individual hopes, fears, and vision.